El síndrome de Terson diagnosticado por ecografía como indicador de extrema gravedad en pacientes neurocríticos / Ultrasound diagnosis of Terson syndrome as an indicator of extreme severity in neurocritical care patients

Introducción: Se denomina síndrome de Terson (ST) a cualquier tipo de hemorragia intraocular (HIO), identificada en pacientes con patología aguda intracraneal. El ST parece estar relacionado con la gravedad clínica en la hemorragia subaracnoidea (HSA), pero en pacientes con trauma craneoencefálico (TCE) y hemorragia intracerebral (HIC), su asociación está por definir. Diseñamos este estudio para evaluar el rendimiento de la ecografía ocular (EO) y su utilidad en la práctica clínica.Materiales y métodosRealizamos un estudio observacional prospectivo, unicéntrico en pacientes neurocríticos. Analizamos los casos con respecto a los controles, identificados con oftalmoscopia indirecta (OI), y por EO. Determinamos las características diagnósticas de la EO. Hicimos un análisis multivariante para determinar asociaciones clínicamente relevantes.ResultadosSe incluyeron 91 pacientes con diagnósticos de HIC (41,76%), HSA (29,67%) y TCE (28,57%). El ST fue identificado por EO en ocho pacientes (8,79%) y en 24 pacientes (24,37%) por OI. La mortalidad ajustada para los pacientes con ST tuvo una OR 4,15 con IC 95% (1,52 - 11,33). Todos los pacientes con ST identificados por EO presentaron una escala de coma de Glasgow < 9 y tuvieron un riesgo elevado de precisar craniectomía descompresiva, una OR 9,84 (1,64 - 59). La EO alcanzó una sensibilidad global de 30,43%, una especificidad del 98,53%, con una precisión diagnóstica de 81,32. Para la detección de la hemorragia vítrea, una sensibilidad y especificidad del 87,5 y 98,5%, respectivamente.ConclusionesEl ST diagnosticado por EO discrimina pacientes neurocríticos de extrema gravedad que pueden requerir el máximo escalón terapéutico y es un factor independiente de mortalidad intrahospitalaria. (AU)

Introduction: Terson syndrome (TS) is defined as any intraocular haemorrhage identified in patients with acute intracranial pathology. TS appears to be associated with clinical severity in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), but the association is yet to be defined in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ocular ultrasound (OU) and its usefulness in clinical practice.Material and methodsWe performed an observational, prospective, single-centre study of neurocritical care patients. We analysed cases and controls, defined according to indirect ophthalmoscopy (IO) and OU findings. We determined the diagnostic characteristics of OU. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinically relevant associations.ResultsThe sample included 91 patients diagnosed with ICH (41.76%), SAH (29.67%), and TBI (28.57%). TS was identified by OU in 8 patients (8.79%) and by IO in 24 (24.37%). The adjusted mortality rate in patients with TS showed an odds ratio (OR) of 4.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-11.33). All patients with TS detected by OU presented Glasgow Coma Scale scores < 9, with an elevated risk of needing decompressive craniectomy (OR: 9.84; 95% CI, 1.64-59). OU presented an overall sensitivity of 30.43%, specificity of 98.53%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.32%. For the detection of vitreous haemorrhage, sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 98.5%, respectively.ConclusionsOU diagnosis of TS identifies extremely critical patients, who may require the highest level of care; TS is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. (AU)

Is minimising waste volume for drawing blood samples in critically ill patients feasible?

INTRODUCTION: Drawing blood samples through a central venous catheter (CVC) is a customary practice in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). It is indicated to discard a volume of waste blood to avoid interference in the results. AIM: To determine whether a lower discard volume for obtaining blood samples from temporary CVCs placed into the internal jugular, femoral or subclavian vein offers valid results. METHOD: A quasi-experimental prospective cross-sectional study for which sixty-five patients of over 18 years of age in ICUs, who had been fitted with a triple lumen central venous catheter, were recruited over a period of eight months. Two consecutive blood samples were extracted with tubes for biochemistry, coagulation and hemogram from each patient from the distal lumen. The first sample was obtained with a discarded waste of 1.5 ml from a total extracted volume of 10.2 ml, similar to the usual waste in our ambit (10 ml). Subsequently the second sample was obtained. The paired t-test was used to analyse the data. The Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to measure the agreement between methods. The reference change value (RCV) was established as the admissible limit of variation between the pairs of samples. RESULTS: A total of 65 sample pairs were drawn (intervention-control). The paired t-test found statistically significant differences with a significance level of α = .05 for chlorine (-.536; .012); prothrombin time (-.092; .019) and prothrombin activity (.284; 1.375).The ICC was greater than .9 in all the variables and the limit determined for the RCV was not surpassed by any value. CONCLUSIONS: The results show the reliability of the blood samples drawn with a discard volume of 1.5 ml.

Minimizar el volumen de descarte para la extracción de muestras sanguíneas en los pacientes críticos: ¿es factible? / Is minimising waste volume for drawing blood samples in critically ill patients feasible?

Introducción: La extracción de muestras sanguíneas a través de un catéter venoso central es una práctica habitual en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Está indicado desechar un volumen de sangre, denominado volumen de descarte, con la finalidad de evitar que los resultados puedan verse alterados. Objetivo: Determinar si un menor volumen de descarte para la obtención de analíticas procedentes de catéter venoso central temporales alojados en la vena yugular interna, femoral o subclavia ofrece resultados válidos. Método: Estudio cuasiexperimental, prospectivo, transversal donde se seleccionaron 65 pacientes críticos mayores de 18 años portadores de catéter venoso central temporal de 3 luces durante un período de 8 meses. Para cada paciente se extrajeron 2 analíticas consecutivas de la luz distal con los valores de hemograma, bioquímica y coagulación comúnmente analizados en el paciente crítico. Se obtuvieron 2 muestras consecutivas: la primera, con un descarte de 1,5ml y un volumen extraído total de 10,2ml, similar al desecho habitual en nuestro medio (10 ml). Seguidamente se obtuvo la segunda muestra. Para el análisis de datos se utilizó la prueba t pareada; para medir la concordancia entre métodos, la representación de Bland-Altman y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Se estableció el valor de referencia del cambio como límite admisible de variación entre los pares de muestras. Resultados: Se extrajeron un total de 65 pares de muestras (intervención-control). El contraste de medias encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas con α=0,05 para cloro (−0,536; 0,012), tiempo de protrombina (−0,092; 0,019) y actividad de protrombina (0,284; 1,375). El coeficiente de correlación intraclase resultó mayor de 0,9 en todas las variables y el valor de referencia del cambio no fue superado por ningún valor. Conclusiones: Los resultados muestran la validez de los análisis de las muestras de sangre extraídas con un volumen de descarte de 1,5ml.(AU)

Introduction: Drawing blood samples through a central venous catheter is a customary practice in intensive care units. It is indicated to discard a volume of waste blood to avoid interference in the results. Aim: To determine whether a lower discard volume for obtaining blood samples from temporary central venous catheters placed into the internal jugular, femoral or subclavian vein offers valid results. Method: A quasi-experimental prospective cross-sectional study for which 65 patients of over 18 years of age in intensive care units, who had been fitted with a triple lumen central venous catheter, were recruited over a period of 8 months. Two consecutive blood samples were extracted with tubes for biochemistry, coagulation and haemogram from each patient from the distal lumen. The first sample was obtained with a discarded waste of 1.5ml from a total extracted volume of 10.2ml, similar to the usual waste in our ambit (10ml). Subsequently the second sample was obtained. The paired t-test was used to analyse the data. The Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to measure the agreement between methods. The reference change value was established as the admissible limit of variation between the pairs of samples. Results: A total of 65 sample pairs were drawn (intervention-control). The paired t-test found statistically significant differences with a significance level of α=0.05 for chlorine (−0.536; 0.012); prothrombin time (−0.092; 0.019) and prothrombin activity (0.284; 1.375). The intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.9 in all the variables and the limit determined for the reference change value was not surpassed by any value. Conclusions: The results show the reliability of the blood samples drawn with a discard volume of 1.5ml.(AU)

Ultrasound diagnosis of Terson syndrome as an indicator of extreme severity in neurocritical care patients.

INTRODUCTION: Terson syndrome (TS) is defined as any intraocular haemorrhage identified in patients with acute intracranial pathology. TS appears to be associated with clinical severity in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), but the association is yet to be defined in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ocular ultrasound (OU) and its usefulness in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed an observational, prospective, single-centre study of neurocritical care patients. We analysed cases and controls, defined according to indirect ophthalmoscopy (IO) and OU findings. We determined the diagnostic characteristics of OU. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinically relevant associations. RESULTS: The sample included 91 patients diagnosed with ICH (41.76%), SAH (29.67%), and TBI (28.57%). TS was identified by OU in 8 patients (8.79%) and by IO in 24 (24.37%). The adjusted mortality rate in patients with TS showed an odds ratio (OR) of 4.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-11.33). All patients with TS detected by OU presented Glasgow Coma Scale scores < 9, with an elevated risk of needing decompressive craniectomy (OR: 9.84; 95% CI, 1.64-59). OU presented an overall sensitivity of 30.43%, specificity of 98.53%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.32%. For the detection of vitreous haemorrhage, sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 98.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OU diagnosis of TS identifies extremely critical patients, who may require the highest level of care; TS is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality.

Epidemiología de la transfusión sanguínea en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva en España: «Transfusion Day» / Epidemiology of blood transfusion in the Spanish Critical Care Units: «Transfusion Day»

Objective: To describe the transfusion practice in the ICUs in Spain, according to national and international recommendations (guidelines). Design: Prospective, cross-sectional, multi-centre study. Scope: Data collection was carried out by means of a questionnaire sent electronically to the Heads of Service of 111 ICUs in Spain. Participants: 1,448 patients were included, aged 61.8 (SD 15.7) years, 66.2% male, with an SOFA of 4.7 ± 3.8 and average stay of 10.62 ± 17.49 days. Variables: Demographic and clinical variables of the patients were collected, as well as variables related to the transfusion act. Results: Of the 1,448 patients, 9.9% received al least one transfusion of any blood product, 3.7% fresh plasma, 3.9% platelets and 8.9% red blood cell concentrate, mainly by analytical criteria (36.2%). Hemoglobin had a mean of 7.8 g/dL (95% CI: 6-9-8.5) and 9.8 g/dL (95% CI: 8.5–11.2) before and after the transfusion, respectively, p < 0.001. The transfusion units had a mean of 2.5 ± 2.4 per patient. The most commonly used blood product was red blood cell concentrate (CH) (90.2%). Patients admitted for surgery had a higher transfusion rate (14.4%) than those admitted for medical pathology (8.9%) (p = 0.006). 5.4% (7/129) of patients who received CH died compared to 2.4% (31/1302) who did not (p = 0.04). Mortality of transfused patients was higher. The transfusion rate in most of hospitals was 5% to 20%, with 18 hospitals (16.21%) having transfusion rates between 20% and 50%. Hospitals with PBM programs and mass transfusion programs had a lower transfusion rate, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, a transfusion prevalence of 9.9% was observed in Spanish Critical Care Units. The most frequent blood product transfused was red blood cells and the main reasons for transfusion were acute anemia with hemodynamic impact and analytical criteria. Mortality of transfused patients was higher (AU)

Objetivo: Describir la práctica transfusional en las UCIs de España, acorde con recomendaciones (guidelines) nacionales e internacionales. Diseño: Estudio prospectivo, transversal y multicéntrico. Ámbito: La recogida de datos se realizó mediante una encuesta enviada electrónicamente a los médicos intensivistas de 111 UCIs de España. Participantes: Se incluyeron 1.448 pacientes, de 61,8 (DE 15,7) años, el 66,2% varones, con un SOFA de 4,7 ± 3,8 y estancia media de 10,62 ± 17,49 días. Variables: Se recogieron variables demográficas y clínicas de los pacientes, así como variables relacionadas con el propio acto transfusional. Resultados: De los 1.448 pacientes, el 9,9% recibieron al menos una transfusión de cualquier hemocomponente, 3,7% de plasma fresco, 3,9% de plaquetas y 8,9% de concentrado de hematíes, siendo la causa principal el umbral transfusional basado en la hemoglobina (36,2%). La hemoglobina tuvo una media de 7,8 g/dL (IC 95%: 6,9–8,5), y de 9.8 g/dl (IC95%: 8,5–11,2) antes y después de la transfusión respectivamente (p < 0,001). Las unidades transfundas tuvo una media por paciente de 2,5 ± 2,4 por paciente. El hemoderivado más utilizado fue el concentrado de hematíes (CH) (90,2%). Los pacientes ingresados por motivos quirúrgicos tuvieron una tasa de transfusión mayor (14,4%) respecto a los ingresados por patología médica (8,9%) (p = 0,006). El 5,4% (7/129) de los pacientes que recibieron CH fallecieron respecto el 2,4% (31/1302) que no lo recibieron (p = 0,04). La tasa de transfusión en la mayor parte de hospitales fue de 5% al 20%, habiendo 18 hospitales (16.21%) con tasas de transfusión entre el 20% y el 50%. Los hospitales con programas PBM y programas de transfusión masiva tuvieron una menor tasa de transfusión, aunque sin ser significativa. Conclusiones: En este estudio multicéntrico de corte transversal se observó una prevalencia transfusional en las unidades de críticos españolas del 9,9% (AU)

Utilidad de la ecografía de la vaina del nervio óptico en pacientes con cese de flujo cerebral / Usefulness of the optic nerve sheath ultrasound in patients with cessation of cerebral flow

La ecografía del diámetro de la vaina del nervio óptico (DVNO), ha demostrado ser una herramienta útil para la detección de hipertensión intracraneal (HIC). Los valores del DVNO en pacientes con cese del flujo sanguíneo cerebral (CFSC), todavía no han sido definidos. Objetivo: Establecer asociación entre el DVNO y el CFSC en pacientes neurocríticos ingresados en una unidad de uidados intensivos (UCI). Pacientes y métodos: Estudio transversal de pacientes ingresados en una UCI polivalente de tercer nivel, con patología neurológica, entre abril de 2017 y abril de 2018. Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes con signos de HIC o riesgo de desarrollarla, neurocríticos con alteraciones clínico radiológicas. Se realizó una ecografía del DVNO en las primeras 24 h de ingreso, que se repitió en aquellos pacientes con evolución a CFSC, establecido mediante Doppler transcraneal. Se compararon los valorares de DVNO de los pacientes con y sin diagnóstico de CFSC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 99 pacientes de los cuales 29 mostraron CFSC por Doppler transcraneal. La medición del DVNO no mostró diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos, 6,59 ± 0,75 en el grupo con CSFC y 6,39 ± 0,56 en el grupo sin CSFC, p = 0,141. Conclusión: En nuestro estudio, no se identificaron valores de DVNO capaces de diagnosticar el CFS (AU)

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasound has proven to be a useful tool for the detection of intracranial hypertension (IH). The ONSD values, in patients with cessation of cerebral blood flow (CCBF), has not been clarified yet. Objective: Establish an association between ONSD and CCBF in neurocritical patients admitted to an ICU. Patients and methods: Cross-sectional study of patients admitted in a third level ICU, between April 2017 and April 2018, with neurological pathology. ONSD ultrasound was performed in the first 24 hours and as the patient was diagnosed of CCBF. The ONSD values of patients with and without diagnosis of CCBF were compared. Results: 99 patients were included, 29 of whom showed CCBF in transcranial Doppler. The ONSD measurement did not demonstrate significant differences between both groups, 6,59 ± 0,75 in the group with CCBF and 6,39 ± 0,56 in the group without CCBF p=0.141. Conclusion: In our study, ONSD values capable of recognizing CCBF were not identified (AU)

Epidemiology of blood transfusion in the Spanish Critical Care Units: «Transfusion Day¼.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the transfusion practice in the ICUs in Spain, according to national and international recommendations (guidelines). DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, multi-centre study. SCOPE: Data collection was carried out by means of a questionnaire sent electronically to the Heads of Service of 111 ICUs in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 1,448 patients were included, aged 61.8 (SD 15.7) years, 66.2% male, with an SOFA of 4.7 ±â€¯3.8 and average stay of 10.62 ±â€¯17.49 days. VARIABLES: Demographic and clinical variables of the patients were collected, as well as variables related to the transfusion act. RESULTS: Of the 1,448 patients, 9.9% received al least one transfusion of any blood product, 3.7% fresh plasma, 3.9% platelets and 8.9% red blood cell concentrate, mainly by analytical criteria (36.2%). Hemoglobin had a mean of 7.8 g/dL (95% CI: 6-9-8.5) and 9.8 g/dL (95% CI: 8.5-11.2) before and after the transfusion, respectively, p < 0.001. The transfusion units had a mean of 2.5 ±â€¯2.4 per patient. The most commonly used blood product was red blood cell concentrate (CH) (90.2%). Patients admitted for surgery had a higher transfusion rate (14.4%) than those admitted for medical pathology (8.9%) (p = 0.006). 5.4% (7/129) of patients who received CH died compared to 2.4% (31/1302) who did not (p = 0.04). Mortality of transfused patients was higher. The transfusion rate in most of hospitals was 5% to 20%, with 18 hospitals (16.21%) having transfusion rates between 20% and 50%. Hospitals with PBM programs and mass transfusion programs had a lower transfusion rate, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, a transfusion prevalence of 9.9% was observed in Spanish Critical Care Units. The most frequent blood product transfused was red blood cells and the main reasons for transfusion were acute anemia with hemodynamic impact and analytical criteria. Mortality of transfused patients was higher.

Recommendations for the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the admission of a high number of patients to the ICU, generally due to severe respiratory failure. Since the appearance of the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, at the end of 2019, in China, a huge number of treatment recommendations for this entity have been published, not always supported by sufficient scientific evidence or with methodological rigor necessary. Thanks to the efforts of different groups of researchers, we currently have the results of clinical trials, and other types of studies, of higher quality. We consider it necessary to create a document that includes recommendations that collect this evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19, but also aspects that other guidelines have not considered and that we consider essential in the management of critical patients with COVID-19. For this, a drafting committee has been created, made up of members of the SEMICYUC Working Groups more directly related to different specific aspects of the management of these patients.

[Recommendations for the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units]. / Recomendaciones para el manejo de los pacientes críticos con COVID-19 en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the admission of a high number of patients to the ICU, generally due to severe respiratory failure. Since the appearance of the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, at the end of 2019, in China, a huge number of treatment recommendations for this entity have been published, not always supported by sufficient scientific evidence or with methodological rigor necessary. Thanks to the efforts of different groups of researchers, we currently have the results of clinical trials, and other types of studies, of higher quality. We consider it necessary to create a document that includes recommendations that collect this evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19, but also aspects that other guidelines have not considered and that we consider essential in the management of critical patients with COVID-19. For this, a drafting committee has been created, made up of members of the SEMICYUC Working Groups more directly related to different specific aspects of the management of these patients.

[Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: Narrative review of the Working Group in Infectious Diseases and Sepsis (GTEIS) and the Working Groups in Transfusions and Blood Products (GTTH)]. / Tratamiento farmacológico de la COVID-19: revisión narrativa de los Grupos de Trabajo de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Sepsis (GTEIS) y del Grupo de Trabajo de Transfusiones Hemoderivados (GTTH).

Infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, known as COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease-19) was initially detected in China in December 2019, and has subsequently spread rapidly throughout the world, to the point that on March 11 the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that the outbreak could be defined as a pandemic. COVID-19 disease ranges from mild flu-like episodes to other serious and even life-threatening conditions, mainly due to acute respiratory failure. These patients are frequently admitted to our Intensive Care Units in relation to acute respiratory distress syndrome. The lack of a treatment based on scientific evidence has led to the use of different management guidelines, in many cases with rapid changes in the applied protocols. Recent reviews in reputed journals have underscored the lack of proven therapies and the need for clinical trials to establish clear and objective treatment guidelines. The present study provides an update on the currently applied treatment, and intends to offer help in relation to daily care, without seeking to replace the protocols adopted in each individual center.

A medicalized hotel as a public health resource for the containment of Covid-19: more than a place for quarantining.

BACKGROUND: To describe the implementation of a medicalized hotel in the community of Madrid as a public health resource for the containment of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and to describe the characteristics of population benefitted. METHODS: A descriptive study of the implementation of the Via Castellana Medicalised Hotel (VCMH) was conducted. The average monthly household income, educational level and occupational social class of the subjects admitted were obtained through a survey conducted during their stay. RESULTS: There was no guidance for launching; however the hotel was coordinated by a tertiary referral hospital and attended the preventive medicine regulations and the decrees of legal regimes and authorization of health services in Madrid. Between 19 March and the 9 May 2020, 399 patients were admitted; 59% (235) were migrant; the main reason for referral (58%) was a lack of house conditions for quarantining, including overcrowding, which when compared with the migrant status a positive correlation was found. Some other reasons for referral were homelessness and eviction. Most of the survey participants had low monthly household income, educational level and social class. CONCLUSIONS: This medicalized hotel provided medical care and offered housing to a subgroup of vulnerable population who could not afford a safe quarantine.